Σύμπαν και άνθρωπος

Όλα στο σύμπαν αφορούν τη μεταμόρφωση.Η ζωή μας μοιάζει με τις σκέψεις που τη διαμορφώνουν.

Μάρκος Αυρήλιος
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα nibiru. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα nibiru. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Παρασκευή 26 Απριλίου 2013

Annals of Earth


Nibiru ala Kepler

New -- December 15, 2003
ANNALS OF EARTH
© 1994, 2003 Dan Sewell Ward
Interlude I -- Nibiru ala Kepler
Kepler’s First Law states that all planets revolve about the Sun in elliptical orbits with the Sun located at one focal point (in the figure, the Sun is located at F1).
The equation for an ellipse is given by:
x2/a2  + y2/b2   =  1
where 2a is the length of the major axis, 2b the length of the minor axis, and 2c the distance between the focal points, F1 and F2.  In this case,
a2  =  b2  +  c2
Solving the ellipse formula for y yields:
y  =   (b/a)  [a2  -  x2  ]1/2
The area under a curve from point x1 to point x2 (the limits on the definite integral) in this case the ellipse or a portion of the ellipse, is given by:
A  =   ò  y dx  =  (b/a)  ò  [a2  -  x2  ]1/2 dx
A  =  (b/2a) { x [a2  -  x2 ]1/2 + a2 [arc sin (x/a)] }   (from x1 to x2)
The area, AT, of the ellipse from perihelion (closest point to F1) to aphelion (closest point to F2) is given by setting x1 = - a and x2 = + a.  Thus,
AT  =  (b/2a) { [ a (a2 - a2 )1/2 + a2 arc sin (a/a) ] - [ -a (a2 - a2 )1/2 + a2 arc sin (- a/a) ] }
AT  =  (b/2a) { [ 0 + a2 w ] - [ 0 + a2 (-w) ] }  =  a b w
where w = arc sin z  is the solution for sin w = z.  If z = 1, sin w = 1 and therefore w = p / 2.  For z = - 1, sin w = -1 and w = - p / 2.  Therefore,
AT  =  a b p / 2
Consider now, the shaded area where the distance from F1 to an arbitrary point, f, on the ellipse is s.  f is also at a distance j along the x-axis and k along the y-axis from the origin.  The area under the curve from perihelion (x = -a) to the point f is given by:
Af  =   (b/2a) { [ - j (a2 - j2 )1/2 + a2 arc sin (- j/a) ] + [ a2 p/2 ] }
The shaded area, Af, is given by:
As  =  Af  -  k ( c - j ) / 2
where k2  =  s2  -  ( c - j )2. 
It follows from Kepler’s Second Law, that the time, t, for a planet to move from perihelion to point f, will be related to the time, T, for a planet to move from perihelion to aphelion, by the relation:  t / T  =  As / AT.   In other words, the ratio of the area swept out in time t, As, to the area swept out in time T, AT, equals the ratio of time t to that of time T.
IN THE CASE OF NIBIRU, let us consider the situation where the orbital period of Nibiru is assumed to be 3600 Earth years.  The question is then:  For how long or for what portion of its orbit is Nibiru within the confines of the known solar system?  If we know this answer, we can then have some idea as to when it would be visible, and also for what period of time “traffic” between Earth and Nibiru might be realistic.
According to Kepler’s Third Law, the mean distance from the Sun, D, is related to the time of revolution about the Sun, T, by the following:
D3 / T2   =   K
where K is a constant.  If D is in Astronomical Units (1 A.U. = 93 million miles; the distance from the Sun to the Earth), and T is in years (Earth), then K = 1.
From Kepler’s Third Law, we can calculate the mean distance from the Sun to Nibiru.  The result is:
D  =  234.89  (about 235 A.U.)
This can be compared to the mean distances of other solar system planets.  For example, Saturn is 9.54 A.U. from the Sun, Uranus is 19.17 A.U., Neptune is 30.03 A.U., and Pluto is 39.42 A. U.  Note, however, that these distances are the mean distances, i.e. an average of the perihelion and the aphelion.  At the same time, the aphelion is simply the length of the major axis of the ellipse less the perihelion distance ( 2 a - p ), i.e.
D  =  ( p + h ) / 2  =  [ p + (2 a - p)] / 2 =  ( 2 a ) / 2  =  a
In the case of Pluto, its perihelion is just slightly within the orbit of Neptune (about 29.74 A.U.), and its aphelion is 49.10 A.U.  In the case of Nibiru, the orbit is much more eccentric, with the distance to aphelion the order of 467 A.U.
In order to calculate the length of the minor axis of Nibiru’s elliptical orbit, we must make a second assumption.  For this case, let us assume that Nibiru’s perihelion is within the asteroid belt, at approximately the mean distance of Ceres (2.75 A.U.).  Then,
b  =  [a2 -  c2 ]1/2   =  [a2  -  (a - p)2  ]1/2  =  [2 a p -  p2 ]1/2   =  [5.5 a - 7.56]1/2 A.U.
b   =  35.8 A. U.
We can now calculate the value of AT ( = a b p / 2 ).  We obtain:
AT   =  13,224 A.U.2
Let us now assume several values of the point f, corresponding to distances within the known solar system.  For simplicity, we will consider the five cases where Nibiru is located at a distance within the outer reaches of the asteroid belt, a second distance where the position of Nibiru is on a line perpendicular to the major axis, a third distance at the equivalent to the mean distance of Saturn, a fourth distance at the equivalent of Uranus, and a fifth situation where f is located at the edge of our known solar system, just beyond the furthermost reach of Pluto. 
For simplicity, we will assume:

bullet
a)  s = 3.20 A.U. -- Asteroid Belt
bullet
b) s = 5.47 A.U. -- Nibiru perpendicular to major axis
bullet
c) 9.53 A.U., -- mean distance to Saturn
bullet
d)  s = 19.17 A.U., -- mean distance to Uranus
bullet
e)  s = 50 A.U. -- just beyond the furthermost reach of Pluto
Using the equation for the ellipse, with x = j and y = k, along with the relationships s2  =  k2  +  (c - j)2 and c = a - p; we obtain for values of j:
a) 234.29 A.U., b) 232.14, c) 227.98 A.U., d) 218.26 A.U., and e) 187.08 A.U.
This yields for the values of Af: 
a)  4.41 A.U.2, b) 9.68 A.U.2, c) 39.18 A.U.2, d) 147.68 A.U.2, e) 706.23  A.U.2
We can then calculate values for As, in which case we obtain:
a) 6.96 A.U.2, b) 9.68 A.U.2, c) 21.32 A.U.2, d) 55.92 A.U.2, e) 218.00  A.U.2
We can now solve for t ( = T As / AT = 1800 As / AT years), the time that Nibiru would be within 3.20, 5.47, 9.53, 19.17, and 50.00 A.U. as it approached or when it departed from its perihelion with the Sun:
bullet
a) 0.95 yrs, (within the asteroid belt)
bullet
b) 1.32 yrs,
bullet
c) 2.90 yrs, (within the orbit of Saturn)
bullet
d) 7.61 yrs, (within the orbit of Uranus)
bullet
e) 29.67 yrs (within the outermost boundary of Pluto)
The total time that Nibiru would be within these distances is just 2 t, or:
bullet
a) 1.90 yrs, (within the asteroid belt)
bullet
b) 2.64 yrs,
bullet
c) 5.80 yrs, (within the orbit of Saturn)
bullet
d) 15.22 yrs, (within the orbit of Uranus)
bullet
e) 59.35 yrs (within the outermost boundary of Pluto)
In essence, Nibiru would be within the 50 A.U. limit for approximately 60 years, and within the orbits of Uranus and Saturn for only roughly 15 and 12 years.  If Nibiru is approximately 4 times the size of the Earth, it should be visible to a powerful telescope within a reasonably wide time span.  At the same time, however, its orbital speed would increase dramatically, averaging some 15,000 mph between the outer limit of Pluto and Uranus, 22,000 mph between Uranus and Saturn, 27,000 mph between Saturn and Jupiter, 55,000 mph in the vicinity of Jupiter, and 65,000 mph between Jupiter and the asteroid belt.

 http://www.halexandria.org/dward799.htm

Epic of Creation


The Epic of Creation is the Sumerian version of how the world began and includes to some degree the formation of the other members of the solar system.  The Sumerian tale is also likely the source of the earliest chapters of the Bible’s Genesis -- the latter which might be considered to be an Executive Summary of the original.  Their similarities are highlighted in Comparative Religions (among other places), but the fact that Genesis was written during the Hebrews’ captivity in Babylon, c. 600 B.C.E. (where access to the Babylonian version of the Epic was readily available) is undoubtedly important.  

The Sumerian Epic of Creation and Genesis both have the interesting feature of being scientifically accurate in terms of what was created first.  In creating a world, you begin with energy (light), form the planet itself, divide the land from the water, grow grass, herbs, fruit (in that order), initiate day/night and seasons, create fish, fowl, cattle, creeping thing and beasts of the earth (again, in that order), until finally you create man.  Then you get really clever and create woman.  Okay, so it’s not all perfect!  
But there is also the distinction between the cosmic creation and the earthly ones.  In the Genesis version, the heavens were created separate from the Earth (by the means of a firmament), while the Sun and Moon were specifically mentioned as “two great lights”.  In the Sumerian version -- which is decidedly less ego-earth-centric -- all of the other planets may be considered to have been described in various stages of grouping themselves into the current arrangement.  It’s just that their names were often attributed to gods, instead of gods and planets!  
The Annals of Earth provide much of the detail of the Epic of Creation (Episode One and/or Episode Two), along with comments on what the various phrases might actually mean.  That is to say, the alternative more speculative version of their meaning.  The idea is to translate mythology into scientifically plausible events, without being confined to the reigning paradigm wherein the ancients could not possibly have known anything!  
The full text of the Epic of Creation (aka the Enuma Elish -- the title being the first words of the ancient text) are located at: <http://www.sacred-texts.com/ane/enuma.htm> with a second website  located at <http://wch.utep.edu/Wrenjohnson/WCH3301/enuma_elish_the_epic_of_creation.htm> (but with virtually no difference in its presentation of the epic).  
Both websites are excellent, but the sacred-texts website is part of a much larger website <http://www.sacred-texts.com/ane/index.htm> which includes numerous sacred texts of the ancient Near East, including:  
                        The Enuma Elish (The Epic of Creation)
                        Adapa and the food of Life
                        Descent of the Goddess Ishtar into the Lower World
                                    (aka Descent into the Underworld)
                        The Seven Evil Spirits
                        The Code of Hammurabi
                        The Babylonian Story of the Deluge and the Epic of Gilgamesh
                        The Religion Of Babylonia And Assyria (by Theophilus G. Pinches)
                        Legends of Babylonia and Egypt (by Leonard W. King)  
Another website <http://saturn.sron.nl/~jheise/akkadian/enuma1_expl.html> is the traditional, mainstream way of interpreting the Epic; essentially, “Subsubsection of John Heise's 'Akkadian language', Chap. 3 (cuneiform texts) about the Babylonian Creation Epic, cuneiform text given, literary style, first primeval beings, explanation of the first few lines, etc.”  John Heise does a credible, scholarly job of discussing the Enuma Elish, e.g. Enuma is translated as When, and Elish as High, i.e. “When in the Height, Heaven was not named...”  However, this is not the interpretation that this website advocates.
Instead of assuming that we’re talking about mythological gods without a factual or real basis, the assumption here is that the so-called “gods and goddesses” within the Epic are descriptions of both the major players in our Solar System (Sun, Moon, Earth and the other planets) and the “gods” who are closely identified with these heavenly bodies.  
The case of the planets being named is well presented by Zecharia Sitchin in his book, The 12th Planet.  Sitchin makes it clear that the planetary description aspect of the Epic is justified, and that the planets and Gods were closely linked.  
This is extremely important in the Sumerian version of Creation -- and probably why the Genesis version is shorter.  One assumes, for example, that the Hebrew writers of Genesis (circa 600 B.C.E.) would not want multiple gods in their story, and furthermore would not want to limit its supreme deity to any one celestial body.  Cut all the allusions to planets, and you don’t have as much to write about.  There was also undoubtedly a strong inclination not to add anything to the creation story -- a potentially blasphemy.  
The Epic of Creation begins with:  
                        “THE FIRST TABLET  
                        When in the height heaven was not named,
                        And the earth beneath did not yet bear a name,
                        And the primeval Apsu, who begat them,
                        And chaos, Tiamut, the mother of them both
                        Their waters were mingled together,
                        And no field was formed, no marsh was to be seen;
                        When of the gods none had been called into being,
                        And none bore a name, and no destinies were ordained;
                        Then were created the gods in the midst of heaven,
                        Lahmu and Lahamu were called into being...
                        Ages increased,...”  
There are other interpretations/translations, but this one identifies several of the players in the drama, from Apsu (Sun), Tiamut (a planet destined for destruction, but initially located at a distance from the Sun equivalent to the main bulk of the asteroid belt), to Lahmu and Lahamu (Mars and Venus).  One that is not specifically named above (and translated  there as “chaos”) is Mummu (aka Mercury).   
Note that after these planets began to be formed, “Ages increased,”.  In other words, time passed, before Jupiter and Saturn arrived on the scene (with the names Kishar and Anshar) along with a third planet, Gaga (emissary of Anshar -- probably Pluto).  After more time, Uranus and Neptune (Anu and Ea -- the latter also known as Nudimmud) arrive.  Everything is looking pretty good, until the intruder, Nibiru, arrives!    

 http://www.halexandria.org/dward179.htm

Πέμπτη 22 Νοεμβρίου 2012

Nibiru





Nibiru, in Babylonian Astronomy translates to "Planet of Crossing" or "Point of Transition", especially of rivers, i.e. river crossings or ferry-boats, a term of the highest point of the ecliptic, i.e. the point of summer solstice, and its associated constellation. The establishment of the Nibiru point is described in tablet 5 of the Enuma Elish. Its cuneiform sign was often a cross, or various winged disc. The Sumerian culture was located in the fertile lands between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, at the southern part of today's Iraq.
As the highest point in the paths of the planets, Nibiru was considered the seat of the summus deus who pastures the stars like sheep, in Babylon identified with Marduk. This interpretation of Marduk as the ruler of the cosmos was identified as an early monotheist tendency in Babylonian religion by Alfred Jeremias.





Some authors believe that the observations of ancient astronomers provide proof that Nibiru is an actual planet or brown dwarf in our solar system. These claims are for the most part dismissed as fringe science or pseudoscience by the mainstream scientific communities of archaeology and astronomy.


The work of Zecharia Sitchin has garnered much attention among ufologists, ancient astronaut theorists and conspiracy theorists. He claims to have uncovered, through his retranslations of Sumerian texts, evidence that the human race was visited by a group of extraterrestrials from a distant planet in our own Solar System.
Part of his theory lies in an astronomical interpretation of the Babylonian creation myth, the Enuma Elish, in which he replaces the names of gods with hypothetical planets. However, since the principal evidence for Sitchin's claims lies in his own personally derived etymologies and not on any scholarly agreed interpretations, his theories remain at most pseudoscience to the majority of academics.
Sitchin's theory proposes the planets Tiamat and Nibiru. Tiamat supposedly existed between Mars and Jupiter. He postulated that it was a thriving world in a much differently shaped solar system, with jungles and oceans, whose orbit was disrupted by the arrival of a large planet or very small star (less than twenty times the size of Jupiter) which passed through the solar system between 65 million and four billion years ago. The new orbits caused Tiamat to collide with one of the moons of this object, which is known as Nibiru. The debris from this collision are thought by the theory's proponents to have variously formed the asteroid belt, the Moon, and the current inclination of the planet Earth.
To the Babylonians, Nibiru was the celestial body or region sometimes associated with the god Marduk. The word is Akkadian and the meaning is uncertain. Because of this, the planet Nibiru is sometimes also referred to as Marduk. Sitchin hypothesizes it as a planet in a highly elliptic orbit around the Sun, with a perihelion passage some 3,600 years ago and assumed orbital period of about 3,750 years; he also claims it was the home of a technologically advanced human-like alien race, the Anunnaki, who allegedly visited Earth in search of gold. These beings eventually created humanity by genetically crossing themselves with extant primates, and thus became the first gods.
Beginning in 1995, websites such as ZetaTalk have identified Nibiru or "Planet X" as a brown dwarf currently within our planetary system, soon to pass relatively close to Earth affecting Earth's magnetics and causing catastrophic damage. Sitchin disagrees as do I.




December 2011
Natural disasters are accelerating exponentially without Nibiru or aliens - but then again Nibiru takes us back to the Sumerian Gods creating a biogenetic experiment called humans (slave labor as we have no powers down here) to mine (caves, mind, consciousness) for gold (alchemy of consciousness) -- returning every 3,600 years -- 12 around 1 X 3 (36=9=closure) - and on and on with myth, math, and metaphor.

Creator Gods and Goddesses take us to ancient alien theory -- they create human biogenetic experiments over and over again, each one more evolved -> then wipe them out with floods (collective unconsciousness) and recreate once again. We certainly seem to be living in biblical flood times now, if you believe that ever happened.

Beyond that we have the true nature of it all - the consciousness hologram which creates the aliens who create humans - the truth revealed at the end of the experience/experiment. Alas, it is the hologram that ends taking with it the knowledge of everything that has transpired within - much like the alien artifact in the Steven Spielberg's mini-series Taken about gray aliens who created a biogenetic experiment combining their DNA with humans to create a more evolved life form. Sound familiar? It also parallels Hitler and the Nazi biogenetic experiments - the Master Plan.
The experiment was archived ... the alien artifact and Allie returning to light.
http://www.crystalinks.com/nibiru.html

Nibiru cataclysm

 
The Nibiru cataclysm is a supposed disastrous encounter between the Earth and a large planetary object (either a collision or a near-miss) which certain groups believe will take place in the early 21st century. Believers in this doomsday event usually refer to this object as Planet X or Nibiru. The idea that a planet-sized object could collide with or pass by Earth in the near future is not supported by any scientific evidence and has been rejected as pseudoscience by astronomers and planetary scientists.[1]
The idea was first put forward in 1995 by Nancy Lieder, founder of the website ZetaTalk. Lieder describes herself as a contactee with the ability to receive messages from extra-terrestrials from the Zeta Reticuli star system through an implant in her brain. She states that she was chosen to warn mankind that the object would sweep through the inner Solar System in May 2003 (though that date was later abandoned) causing Earth to undergo a pole shift that would destroy most of humanity. The prediction has subsequently spread beyond Lieder's website and has been embraced by numerous Internet doomsday groups, most of which link the event to the 2012 phenomenon. Although the name "Nibiru" is derived from the works of the late ancient astronaut writer Zecharia Sitchin and his interpretations of Babylonian and Sumerian mythology, Sitchin denied any connection between his work and various claims of a coming apocalypse.

Origins

Nibiru cataclysm
Claims Earth's imminent collision or near miss with a giant planetoid
Related scientific disciplines Astronomy, archaeology
Year proposed 1995.
Original proponents Nancy Lieder
Subsequent proponents Marshall Masters, Jaysen Rand, Mark Hazlewood, Pana Wave
Pseudoscientific concepts
The idea of the Nibiru encounter originated with Nancy Lieder, a Wisconsin woman who claims that as a girl she was contacted by gray extraterrestrials called Zetas, who implanted a communications device in her brain. In 1995, she founded the website ZetaTalk to disseminate her ideas.[2] Lieder first came to public attention on Internet newsgroups during the build-up to Comet Hale–Bopp's 1997 perihelion. She stated, speaking as the Zetas, that "The Hale-Bopp comet does not exist. It is a fraud, perpetrated by those who would have the teeming masses quiescent until it is too late. Hale-Bopp is nothing more than a distant star, and will draw no closer."[3] She claimed that the Hale-Bopp story was manufactured to distract people from the imminent arrival of a large planetary object, "Planet X", which would soon pass by Earth and destroy civilization.[3] After Hale-Bopp's perihelion revealed it as one of the brightest and longest-observed comets of the last century,[4] Lieder removed the first two sentences of her initial statement from her site, though they can still be found in Google's archives.[3] Her claims eventually made the New York Times.[5]
Lieder described Planet X as roughly four times the size of the Earth, and said that its closest approach would occur on May 27, 2003, resulting in the Earth's rotation ceasing for exactly 5.9 terrestrial days. This would be followed by the Earth's pole destabilising in a pole shift (a physical pole shift, with the Earth's pole physically moving, rather than a geomagnetic reversal) caused by magnetic attraction between the Earth's core and the magnetism of the passing planet. This in turn would disrupt the Earth's magnetic core and lead to subsequent displacement of the Earth's crust.[6]
After Lieder, the first person to propagate her Planet X idea was Mark Hazlewood, a former member of the ZetaTalk community, who in 2001 published a book: Blindsided: Planet X Passes in 2003. Lieder would later accuse him of being a confidence trickster.[7] A Japanese cult called the Pana Wave Laboratory, which blocked off roads and rivers with white cloths to protect itself from electromagnetic attacks, also warned that the world would end in May 2003 after the approach of a tenth planet.[8]
Roughly a week before the supposed arrival of Planet X, Lieder appeared on KROQ-FM radio in Los Angeles, and advised listeners to put their pets down in anticipation of the event. When asked if she had done so, she replied that she had, and that "The puppies are in a happy place." She also advised that "A dog makes a good meal".[9] After the 2003 date passed without incident, Lieder said that it was merely a "White Lie ... to fool the establishment,"[10] and said that to disclose the true date would give those in power enough time to declare martial law and trap people in cities during the shift, leading to their deaths.[11]
Many Internet sites continue to proclaim that Lieder's object is en route to Earth, often citing its arrival date as December, 2012. This date has gathered many apocalyptic associations, as it is the end of the current cycle (baktun) in the long count in the Mayan calendar. Several writers have published books connecting the encounter with 2012.[12]

Zecharia Sitchin and Sumer

Although Lieder originally referred to the object as "Planet X", it has become deeply associated with Nibiru, a planet from the works of ancient astronaut proponent Zecharia Sitchin, particularly his book The 12th Planet. According to Sitchin's interpretation of Babylonian religious texts, which contradicts conclusions reached by credited scholars on the subject,[13][14] a giant planet (called Nibiru or Marduk) passes by Earth every 3,600 years and allows its sentient inhabitants to interact with humanity. These beings, which Sitchin identified with the Annunaki of Sumerian myth, would become humanity's first gods.[15] Lieder first made the connection between Nibiru and her Planet X on her site in 1996 ("Planet X does exist, and it is the 12th Planet, one and the same.").[16]
However, Sitchin, who died in 2010, denied any connection between his work and Lieder's claims. In 2007, partly in response to Lieder's proclamations, Sitchin published a book, The End of Days, which set the time for the last passing of Nibiru by Earth at 556 BC, which would mean, given the object's supposed 3,600-year orbit, that it would return sometime around AD 2900.[17] He did however say that he believed that the Annunaki might return earlier by spaceship, and that the timing of their return would coincide with the shift from the astrological Age of Pisces to the Age of Aquarius, sometime between 2090 and 2370.[18]

Scientific criticism

Astronomers reject the idea of Nibiru, and have made efforts to inform the public that there is no threat to Earth in 2012.[19] They point out that such an object so close to Earth would be easily visible to the naked eye, as Jupiter and Saturn are both visible to the naked eye, and are dimmer than Nibiru would be at their distances. A planet such as Nibiru would create noticeable effects in the orbits of the outer planets.[20] Some counter this by claiming that the object has been concealed behind the Sun for several years, though this would be geometrically impossible.[12] Amateur photographs supposedly showing Nibiru near the Sun are usually the result of lens flares, false images of the Sun created by reflections within the lens.[21]
Astronomer Mike Brown notes that if this object's orbit were as described, it would only have lasted in the Solar System for a million years or so before Jupiter expelled it, and that there is no way another object's magnetic field could have such an effect on Earth.[22] Lieder's assertions that the approach of Nibiru would cause the Earth's rotation to stop or its axis to shift violate the laws of physics. In his rebuttal of Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision, which made the same claim that the Earth's rotation could be stopped and then restarted, Carl Sagan noted that, "the energy required to brake the Earth is not enough to melt it, although it would result in a noticeable increase in temperature: The oceans would [be] raised to the boiling point of water ... [Also,] how does the Earth get started up again, rotating at approximately the same rate of spin? The Earth cannot do it by itself, because of the law of the conservation of angular momentum."[23]
In a 2009 interview with the Discovery Channel, Mike Brown noted that, while it is not impossible that the Sun has a distant planetary companion, such an object would have to be lying very far from the observed regions of the Solar System to have no gravitational effect on the other planets. A Mars-sized object could lie undetected at 300 AU (10 times the distance of Neptune); a Jupiter-sized object at 30,000 AU. To travel 1000 AU in two years, an object would need to be moving at 2400 km/s – faster than the galactic escape velocity. At that speed, any object would be shot out of the Solar System, and then out of the Milky Way galaxy into intergalactic space.[24]

Conspiracy theories

Many believers in the imminent approach of Planet X/Nibiru accuse NASA of deliberately covering up visual evidence of its existence.[25] One such accusation involves the IRAS infrared space observatory, launched in 1983. The satellite briefly made headlines due to an "unknown object" that was at first described as "possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this Solar System".[26] This newspaper article has been cited by proponents of the Nibiru cataclysm, beginning with Lieder herself, as evidence for the existence of Nibiru.[27] However, further analysis revealed that of several initially unidentified objects, nine were distant galaxies and the tenth was "intergalactic cirrus"; none were found to be Solar System bodies.[28]
Another accusation frequently made by websites predicting the collision is that the U.S. government built the South Pole Telescope (SPT) to track Nibiru's trajectory, and that the object has been imaged optically.[29] However, the SPT (which is not funded by NASA) is a radio telescope, and cannot take optical images. Its South Pole location was chosen due to the low-humidity environment, and there is no way an approaching object could be seen only from the South Pole.[30] The "picture" of Nibiru posted on YouTube was revealed, in fact, to be a Hubble image of the expanding light echo around the star V838 Mon.[29]
Another conspiracy claim regards a patch of missing data in Google Sky near the constellation of Orion, which has often been cited as evidence that Nibiru has been redacted. However, the same region of sky can still be viewed by thousands of amateur astronomers. A scientist at Google said that the missing data is due to a glitch in the stitching software used to piece the images together.[31] Another piece of claimed evidence drawn from Google Sky is the carbon star CW Leonis, which is the brightest object in the 10 μm infrared sky and is frequently claimed to be Nibiru.[32]

Misappellations

Believers in Planet X/Nibiru have given it many names since it was first proposed. All are, in fact, names for other real, hypothetical or imaginary Solar System objects that bear little resemblance to Nibiru as described by Lieder or Sitchin.

Planet X

Lieder drew the name Planet X from the hypothetical planet once searched for by astronomers to account for discrepancies in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune.[16] In 1894, Bostonian astronomer Percival Lowell became convinced that the planets Uranus and Neptune had slight discrepancies in their orbits. He concluded that they were being tugged by the gravity of another, more distant planet, which he called "Planet X".[33] However, nearly a century of searching failed to turn up any evidence for such an object (Pluto was initially believed to be Planet X, but was later determined to be too small).[34] In 1992, astronomer Myles Standish showed that the supposed discrepancies in the planets' orbits were illusory; the product of an overestimation of the mass of Neptune.[35] Today astronomers accept that Planet X does not exist.[36]

Hercolubus

In 1999, New Age author V. M. Rabolu wrote in Hercolubus or Red Planet that Barnard's star is actually a planet known to the ancients as Hercolubus, which purportedly came dangerously close to Earth in the past, destroying Atlantis, and will come close to Earth again.[37] Lieder subsequently used Rabolu's ideas to bolster her claims.[38]
Barnard's star has been directly measured to be 5.98 ± 0.003 light years from Earth (35.15 trillion miles).[39] While it is approaching Earth, Barnard's Star will not make its closest approach to the Sun until around 11,700 AD, when it will approach to within some 3.8 light-years.[40] This is only slightly closer than the closest star to the Sun (Proxima Centauri) lies today.

Nemesis

Believers in Planet X/Nibiru have often confused it with Nemesis,[41] a hypothetical star first proposed by physicist Richard A. Muller. In 1984, Muller postulated that mass extinctions were not random, but appeared to occur in the fossil record with a loose periodicity that ranged from 26–34 million years. He attributed this supposed pattern to a heretofore undetected companion to the Sun, either a dim red dwarf or a brown dwarf, lying in an elliptical, 26-million-year orbit. This object, which he named Nemesis, would, once every 26 million years, pass through the Oort cloud, the shell of over a trillion icy objects believed to be the source of long-period comets that orbit at thousands of times Pluto's distance from the Sun. Nemesis's gravity would then disturb the comets' orbits and send them into the inner Solar System, causing the Earth to be bombarded. However, to date no direct evidence of Nemesis has been found.[42] Though the idea of Nemesis appears similar to the Nibiru cataclysm, they are, in fact, very different, as Nemesis, if it existed, would have an orbital period thousands of times longer, and would never come near Earth itself.[41]

Sedna or Eris

Still others confuse Nibiru with Sedna or Eris, trans-Neptunian objects discovered by Mike Brown in 2003 and 2005 respectively.[43][44] However, despite having been described as a "tenth planet" in an early NASA press release,[45] Eris (provisional designation: 2003 UB313) is now classified as a dwarf planet. Only slightly more massive than Pluto,[46] Eris has a well-determined orbit that never takes it closer than 5.5 billion km from the Earth.[47] Sedna is slightly smaller than Pluto,[48] and never comes closer to Earth than 11.4 billion km.[49] Mike Brown believes the confusion results from both the real Eris and the imaginary Nibiru having extremely elliptical orbits.[43]

Tyche

Others have tied it to Tyche;[50] the name proposed by John Matese and Daniel Whitmire of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette for an object they believe to be influencing the orbits of comets in the Oort cloud.[51] The name, after the "good sister" of the Greek goddess Nemesis, was chosen to distinguish it from the similar Nemesis hypothesis as, unlike Nemesis (or Nibiru), Matese and Whitmire do not believe that their object poses a threat to Earth.[52] Also, this object, if it exists, would, like Nemesis, have an orbit hundreds of times longer than that proposed for Nibiru, and never come near the inner Solar System.[50]

Comet Elenin

Some have also associated Nibiru with Comet Elenin,[53] a long-period comet discovered by Russian astronomer Leonid Elenin on December 10, 2010.[54] On October 16, 2011, Elenin made its closest approach to the Earth at a distance of 0.2338 AU (34,980,000 km; 21,730,000 mi),[55][56] which is slightly closer than the planet Venus.[57] Nevertheless, in the leadup to its closest approach, claims spread on conspiracy websites concluded that it was on a collision course, that it was as large as Jupiter or even a brown dwarf, and even that the name of the discoverer, Leonid Elenin, was in fact code for ELE, or an Extinction Level Event.[53]
Although the sizes of comets are difficult to determine without close observation, Comet Elenin is likely to be less than 10 km in diameter.[58] Elenin himself estimates that the comet nucleus is roughly 3–4 km in diameter.[59] This would make it millions of times smaller than the supposed Nibiru. Comet hysteria is not uncommon.[60] Attempts have been made to correlate Elenin's alignments with the 2011 Japan earthquake, the 2010 Canterbury earthquake, and 2010 Chile earthquake; however, even discounting Elenin's tiny size, earthquakes are driven by forces within the earth, and cannot be triggered by the passage of nearby objects.[61] In 2011, Leonid Elenin ran a simulation on his blog in which he increased the mass of the comet to that of a brown dwarf (0.05 solar masses). He demonstrated that its gravity would have caused noticeable changes in the orbit of Saturn years before its arrival in the inner Solar System.[62]
In August, 2011, Comet Elenin began to disintegrate,[63][64] and by the time of its closest approach in October 2011 the comet was undetected even by large, ground based telescopes.[65]

Public reaction

The impact of the public fear of the Nibiru cataclysm has been especially felt by professional astronomers. Mike Brown now says that Nibiru is the most common pseudoscientific topic he is asked about.[22]
David Morrison, director of SETI, CSI Fellow and Senior Scientist at NASA's Astrobiology Institute at Ames Research Center, says he receives 20 to 25 emails a week about the impending arrival of Nibiru: some frightened, others angry and naming him as part of the conspiracy to keep the truth of the impending apocalypse from the public, and still others asking whether or not they should kill themselves, their children or their pets.[25][66] Half of these emails are from outside the U.S.[12] "Planetary scientists are being driven to distraction by Nibiru," notes science writer Govert Schilling, "And it is not surprising; you devote so much time, energy and creativity to fascinating scientific research, and find yourself on the tracks of the most amazing and interesting things, and all the public at large is concerned about is some crackpot theory about clay tablets, god-astronauts and a planet that doesn't exist."[1] Morrison states that he hopes that the non-arrival of Nibiru could serve as a teaching moment for the public, instructing them on "rational thought and baloney detection", but doubts that will happen.[25]
Morrison noted in a lecture recorded on FORA.tv that there was a huge disconnect between the large number of people on the Internet who believed in Nibiru's arrival in 2012 and the majority of scientists who have never heard of it. To date he is the only major NASA scientist to speak out regularly against the Nibiru phenomenon.[66]

Cultural influence

A viral marketing campaign for Sony Pictures' 2009 film 2012, directed by Roland Emmerich, which depicts the end of the world in that year, featured a supposed warning from the "Institute for Human Continuity" that listed the arrival of Planet X as one of its doomsday scenarios.[67] Mike Brown attributes a spike in concerned emails and phone calls he has received from the public to this site.[43]
Lars von Trier's 2011 film Melancholia features a plot in which a planet emerges from behind the Sun onto a collision course with Earth.[68] Announcing his company's purchase of the film, the head of Magnolia Pictures said in a press release, "As the 2012 apocalypse is upon us, it is time to prepare for a cinematic last supper."[69]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page